This Core i7-based system represents a state-of-the-art high-end Windows gaming laptop for comparison. We also ran a subset of these games and synthetic tests on a GeForce RTX 3070-equipped gaming laptop we are in the process of reviewing: the Razer Blade 15 Advanced Edition. GFXBench renders the scenes without displaying them on the screen, and 3DMark renders them in a window, to account for resolution differences automatically, while we ran the Valley test at the same 1,920 by 1,200 pixels that we ran the games at. These render scenes of richly detailed gaming-style graphics as a means to compare relative performance across devices with different operating systems. We also ran three graphics simulations: the cutting-edge 3DMark (specifically the Wild Life graphics simulation, recently released and compatible with macOS and Windows) and GFXBench Pro, as well as the older Unigine Valley test. (Testing at each laptop's native resolution would have rendered the scores non-comparable.) All games were run at a full-HD-equivalent resolution (1,920 by 1,200 pixels) because the two new MacBook Pros have differing native display resolutions. The last game has far lesser demands on a computer’s graphics power than the rest of the lot, so we used its built-in benchmark for simulating how long it takes the AI to complete a turn, for a different perspective on game performance. We also tested out a Total War game ( Total War: Warhammer II), the Hitman reboot from 2016, and Sid Meier’s Civilization VI. Among the most graphics-intensive Mac titles in our benchmark suite are the Tomb Raider series, from which we ran the built-in benchmarks in Rise of the Tomb Raider and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Many of the AAA titles compatible with Macs come from British developer Feral Interactive, which partners with studios to bring their creations to platforms other than Windows. So we ran a handful of graphics-intensive games (and a few less-demanding titles) released in the past few years on both the M1 Pro-equipped 14-inch MacBook Pro and the M1 Max-equipped 16-inch MacBook Pro to see what they are capable of. This chicken-and-egg situation means that even if the GPU portions of the M1 Pro and M1 Max are theoretically as capable as (or better than) the AMD Radeon or integrated Intel silicon they replace in past MacBooks, you still don't have an extensive game selection to take advantage of. And most game developers have overlooked macOS as a serious gaming platform, focusing instead on consoles and Windows. Apple makes it clear that its flagship MacBook Pro laptops are optimized for heavy-duty content creation, not gaming. Best Hosted Endpoint Protection and Security Software.
0 kommentar(er)
